<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Your E-Learning Courses Pushed or Pulled?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.articulate.com/rapid-elearning/are-your-e-learning-courses-pushed-or-pulled/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.articulate.com/rapid-elearning/are-your-e-learning-courses-pushed-or-pulled/</link>
	<description>Practical, real-world tips for e-learning success.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:51:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Viral Notebook &#124; Michael M. Grant, Ph.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.articulate.com/rapid-elearning/are-your-e-learning-courses-pushed-or-pulled/comment-page-1/#comment-8287</link>
		<dc:creator>Viral Notebook &#124; Michael M. Grant, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.articulate.com/rapid-elearning/?p=985#comment-8287</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BIG P pull and little p pull &#171; El blog de 082_m5_001_01</title>
		<link>http://www.articulate.com/rapid-elearning/are-your-e-learning-courses-pushed-or-pulled/comment-page-1/#comment-8121</link>
		<dc:creator>BIG P pull and little p pull &#171; El blog de 082_m5_001_01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.articulate.com/rapid-elearning/?p=985#comment-8121</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Tom Kuhlmann writes about designing e-learning courses using a pull approach vs. a push approach. Ideally, it’d be nice to be able to pull information from any source than just pulling from the content provided. This is kind of BIG P pull and little p pull. You can pull content but you’re still within a course structure that has been pushed to you, there’s a little pull. Unless structure is definitely needed a much more engaging option to traditional push methods of content delivery.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Tom Kuhlmann writes about designing e-learning courses using a pull approach vs. a push approach. Ideally, it’d be nice to be able to pull information from any source than just pulling from the content provided. This is kind of BIG P pull and little p pull. You can pull content but you’re still within a course structure that has been pushed to you, there’s a little pull. Unless structure is definitely needed a much more engaging option to traditional push methods of content delivery.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Learning Store</title>
		<link>http://www.articulate.com/rapid-elearning/are-your-e-learning-courses-pushed-or-pulled/comment-page-1/#comment-7566</link>
		<dc:creator>Learning Store</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 10:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.articulate.com/rapid-elearning/?p=985#comment-7566</guid>
		<description>Too much information is a hinderance to the student. A good balance will keep the student busy enough to study how much they want and learn the information when needed instead of giving a load of material and saying &#039;read that&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too much information is a hinderance to the student. A good balance will keep the student busy enough to study how much they want and learn the information when needed instead of giving a load of material and saying &#8216;read that&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.articulate.com/rapid-elearning/are-your-e-learning-courses-pushed-or-pulled/comment-page-1/#comment-6651</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.articulate.com/rapid-elearning/?p=985#comment-6651</guid>
		<description>@Nancy: I don&#039;t use delicious for links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nancy: I don&#8217;t use delicious for links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy  Corchado</title>
		<link>http://www.articulate.com/rapid-elearning/are-your-e-learning-courses-pushed-or-pulled/comment-page-1/#comment-6645</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy  Corchado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.articulate.com/rapid-elearning/?p=985#comment-6645</guid>
		<description>do you can make a delicious.com link?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do you can make a delicious.com link?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scalable Learning and Learnscapes in Social Business Design &#171; Skilful Minds</title>
		<link>http://www.articulate.com/rapid-elearning/are-your-e-learning-courses-pushed-or-pulled/comment-page-1/#comment-6358</link>
		<dc:creator>Scalable Learning and Learnscapes in Social Business Design &#171; Skilful Minds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.articulate.com/rapid-elearning/?p=985#comment-6358</guid>
		<description>[...] Rapid E-Learning Blog recently offered a model of pull learning as formal learning in which the learner is presented with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rapid E-Learning Blog recently offered a model of pull learning as formal learning in which the learner is presented with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Wrest</title>
		<link>http://www.articulate.com/rapid-elearning/are-your-e-learning-courses-pushed-or-pulled/comment-page-1/#comment-5910</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Wrest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 14:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.articulate.com/rapid-elearning/?p=985#comment-5910</guid>
		<description>Very nice post Tom; with sales training scenarios/case-method works wonderfully.  Of note; I&#039;ve had even greater success in easy-to-use help systems (even predicitive EPSS on occassion).  Learning at the moment of need is a very hard sell though.  So with that said, I wonder how effective using a pull-like course would be in working with clients who actually need a help system, not a course.  Great post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice post Tom; with sales training scenarios/case-method works wonderfully.  Of note; I&#8217;ve had even greater success in easy-to-use help systems (even predicitive EPSS on occassion).  Learning at the moment of need is a very hard sell though.  So with that said, I wonder how effective using a pull-like course would be in working with clients who actually need a help system, not a course.  Great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.articulate.com/rapid-elearning/are-your-e-learning-courses-pushed-or-pulled/comment-page-1/#comment-5865</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.articulate.com/rapid-elearning/?p=985#comment-5865</guid>
		<description>@Matthias:  considering the experience of the learner is critical.  However, I think this approach would work fine with a new learner.  You&#039;re not leaving them to fend for themselves.  Instead you do offer &quot;further guidance&quot; in the form of additional resources.  

There could be a &quot;tell me more&quot; type link to addtional info.  You could introduce an avatar like guide that the person can visit for additional information and guidance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Matthias:  considering the experience of the learner is critical.  However, I think this approach would work fine with a new learner.  You&#8217;re not leaving them to fend for themselves.  Instead you do offer &#8220;further guidance&#8221; in the form of additional resources.  </p>
<p>There could be a &#8220;tell me more&#8221; type link to addtional info.  You could introduce an avatar like guide that the person can visit for additional information and guidance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthias Heil</title>
		<link>http://www.articulate.com/rapid-elearning/are-your-e-learning-courses-pushed-or-pulled/comment-page-1/#comment-5862</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthias Heil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 12:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.articulate.com/rapid-elearning/?p=985#comment-5862</guid>
		<description>After having pondered this marvellous article from a school teacher&#039;s perspective for a few days, I guess that the target group and the level of their abilitites may decide upon which approach to take, or rather what to emphasize more in your course design. -- Whereas more advanced students that have already aquired some experience in dealing with texts, or sorting the wheat from the chaff, will probably find it more fulfilling to be granted more freedom in chosing their paths to more knowledge, younger and/or less experienced learners may be overtaxed, and feel lost if left to their own devices without further guidance. -- Ideally - and although the pull approach sounds so much more interesting, modern and Learning2.0ish, maybe both aspects should somehow be implemented in course designs to provide a balanced and differentiated package that does not leave parts of our target groups in the dark?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After having pondered this marvellous article from a school teacher&#8217;s perspective for a few days, I guess that the target group and the level of their abilitites may decide upon which approach to take, or rather what to emphasize more in your course design. &#8212; Whereas more advanced students that have already aquired some experience in dealing with texts, or sorting the wheat from the chaff, will probably find it more fulfilling to be granted more freedom in chosing their paths to more knowledge, younger and/or less experienced learners may be overtaxed, and feel lost if left to their own devices without further guidance. &#8212; Ideally &#8211; and although the pull approach sounds so much more interesting, modern and Learning2.0ish, maybe both aspects should somehow be implemented in course designs to provide a balanced and differentiated package that does not leave parts of our target groups in the dark?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Push or Pull for eLearning? School-Networking: &#8230;if we don&#8217;t grab the future, the future will grab us&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.articulate.com/rapid-elearning/are-your-e-learning-courses-pushed-or-pulled/comment-page-1/#comment-5859</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Push or Pull for eLearning? School-Networking: &#8230;if we don&#8217;t grab the future, the future will grab us&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 17:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.articulate.com/rapid-elearning/?p=985#comment-5859</guid>
		<description>[...] Are Your E-Learning Courses Pushed or Pulled? - The Rapid eLearning Blog via kwout [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Are Your E-Learning Courses Pushed or Pulled? &#8211; The Rapid eLearning Blog via kwout [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
